Tuesday, March 18, 2014

The Politics of Casual Sex

With my bottom perched on my front porch ledge, legs dangling, and face warm from an overheating cell phone, I spent a very cliché, High-School-Musical-esque amount of time gossiping with friends about what we thought “the boysss” would be like the summer before we started college.

Do you think they’ll have facial hair – like all of them?
I wonder if college White boys are more open to dating Black girls…
Do you think sex with a college freshman will be any better than with a high school senior?
 I doubt it…

Initially, this curiosity, mirrored by my friends’ shared sense of adventure, sparked the kind of colorful, unproductive dialogue that characterizes summertime, porch ledge Girl Talk.

And then there was a shift in the conversation.

“I’m not gonna sleep around. I don’t want to be seen as 'that slutty freshman.' "

This change of focus agitated me. Beyond this, though, I was perplexed. We were all single, young, attractive little women. Why had the center of our sex talk gone from “I” to “He?”

We had no boyfriends. Certainly no husbands -- what compelled us to compromise? The entire concept of casual sex seemed to be founded on fun-loving and rule-bending. I wanted them to stick with the program.

Outnumbered, I decided, at the very least, I could support my girlfriends’ employing the Power of the Pussy strategy to further their own agendas: gaining respect was the end game.

And then, last week, one of these friends – we’ll call her Jezebel – told me the story of her sexual dissatisfaction. It finally clicked for me. In the juxtaposition of female sexual freedom and male desires, the latter should never be weighted more heavily. In putting our desires on the backburner, young women are allowing men to re-cast us in our own sex lives - placing us where they find us most desirable in their own fantasies.

I’ll let her tell it.

“I’ve spent this whole first semester trying to be The Good Girl. But for what? I’m not The Good Girl. At least before I did what I wanted, and I had fun. Now, I pretend to be The Good Girl so guys will like me. And I still haven’t gotten the attention of the guy I like. And I’m not having sex. Trying to be The Good Girl has completely backfired. Because I’m not the Good Girl.”

If in reaction to this quote you felt the sudden compulsion to text an old flame, twerk in the spirit of liberation, or exclaim “OH SHIT,” you ain’t The Good Girl either, honey.

Those of you who follow me on twitter (@knowmorenoless_) – no, I am not above a transparent Tyler- Perry-style self-promo -- have read my rants on what I think is at the root of The Good Girl obsession:

The Virgin/Whore false dichotomy.*
*False dichotomy is a fallacy that invalidates arguments by presenting two –usually extreme – end points as the only options in a given scenario.*

This is the socially constructed – and thus, inherently in need of analysis and challenge – concept that women’s sexual identities are limited to either Virgins (essentially Good Girls) or Whores.

Like most young women, Jezebel resents the Whore label, and all its connotations; she desires respect. She also knows that there is a male desire for a respectable Good Girl -- and a challenge.

With this, Jezebel strategized: in abstaining from sex, she could position herself at the center of male desire and respect. Nevertheless, as is the case with most dishonest political strategies, Jezebel’s constructed Good Girl image backfired. In tapering her persona to the desires of men, she found herself playing a supporting role in her own sexuality, while the men she sought respect from starred.

She got The Good Girl’s respect. She lost The Whore’s sex life.

Problematically, Jezebel was not The Good Girl, she wanted to “put out.” She, like so many of us, was shrinking her own sexual identity to fit into the confines of the male fantasy.

With all flawed Either/Or arguments, there is a consequence for making the wrong choice. In the case of the Virgin/Whore scenario, “I’ll take ‘Whore’ for 200, Alex” is the quickest way to receive a (one-way) ticket to Sluttyville – the land of unsolicited, public ass slaps, name-calling, leaked nude pictures, and rarely returned phone calls. 

Of course Jezebel didn’t want to be "that slutty freshman." But she also hated being the sexless Good Girl, waiting on a well-behaving man to liberate her.

For the readers who will, again, accuse me of over-analyzing: the Virgin/Whore construct is highly visible in mainstream media:



This meme perfectly illustrates the dichotomy as perpetuated by pop culture – the words are literally Kanye West lyrics. What’s better, I found the meme on Instagram, the social media site.

Like that rapey gym teacher in Mean Girls, pop culture is always there, lying to young women about how limited our options are.



In the Jezebel cases, the fear of being labeled a hoe is – even if temporarily -- stronger than the sense of entitlement we feel to our sexuality.

Admittedly, the argument could be made that Jezebel was actually taking power back, and not relinquishing it: in abstaining from sex, she used the Power of the Pussy as a bargaining tool – only planning to “give it up” to the men who respected her. But do you see how the emphasis here is still on the man?

"He needs to earn it."
versus...
"I really want to have sex with him."

The former phrase presents female sexual consent as a reward for good male behavior, whereas the latter poses it as the result of female desire.

In the casual sex ring, The Good Girl is supposed to present herself as the trophy, which may seem flattering – empowering, even – but note where the power lies here:

If our sexual consent is like a trophy, wouldn’t that prohibit us from enjoying desire? Trophies don’t choose when they want to be won based on personal desire; they reward whoever performs best. Doesn’t this reduce our sexual roles to being reactionary? Think about it: the trophy is indifferent – it doesn’t desire to be claimed any more than it wishes to be left to collect dust; its consent is completely dependent on the behavior of the athletes. So, if women are the trophies, and men are the athletes, doesn’t this mean that we have sex out of congratulatory obligation, and not intrinsic desire?

The Good Girl’s sexuality only operates within the realm of male behavior. There is no space for her to make self-centered sexual decisions because her consent is inseparable from his behavior – whether good or bad. Although it may seem she holds the Power of the Pussy, in truth, HE does.

The Jezebels -- those of us who just don’t think like The Good Girls. The girls uninterested in eluding sex the way trophies tease champions – are casual sex politicians: working to erase the Virgin/Whore boundary, maintain in power, and resist internalizing hateful, ill-informed public opinion.